Posts Tagged ‘Liabilities’

Chipotle deprived disabled of food view

| Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 | No Comments »

Chipotle’s experience lets its patrons see the food being prepared. Chipotle Mexican Grill was sued for its counters being too high. The final decision of the lawsuit is below in this article from the San Francisco Chronicle.

On the 20th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a federal appeals court said the law entitles wheelchair users at a restaurant to the same view as everyone else of the food that awaits them – in this case, burritos, tacos and the rest of the fare at Chipotle Mexican Grill.

The 45-inch-high wall between the customer line and the food preparation counter at two Chipotle restaurants in San Diego County, which blocked the view of patrons in wheelchairs, violated the 1990 federal law that requires equal treatment of the disabled, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said Monday.

(Read more on Chipotle’s Counters Block Disabled View of Food)

Share/Bookmark

NEW ADA STANDARDS Signed in by Obama

| Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 | No Comments »

The new federal standards for the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law by Obama yesterday on the 20th Anniversary of the signing of the ADA by the first George Bush.

You can see Obama’s speech below:

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Good evening, everybody. (Applause.) Thank you so much. Well, we have a gorgeous day to celebrate an extraordinary event in the life of this nation. Welcome, all of you, to our White House. And thank you, Robert, for the wonderful introduction. It is a pleasure and honor to be with all of you on the 20th anniversary of one of the most comprehensive civil rights bills in the history of this country — the Americans with Disabilities Act. (Applause.)

(Obama’s Speech on the ADA continued…)

You can also read the updated guidelines as they apply to the older regulations. Basically the ANSI/IBC standards of 2004 which incorporated the ADAAG 2004 have been absorbed into the Revised Standards of 2010. Facilities which are going to undergo construction 18 months from this date need to comply with the 2010 standards IF they have not yet complied with the 1991 standards. You can see the text directly below.

Title 2 ADA regulations for 2010

Many of the 2010 requirements are stricter. A major difference is that the 1991 requirement for van accessible space be 1 for every 8 total accessible spaces has changed to 1 for every 6. Another difference is the increase of space required for a side transfer in a single user toilet stall from 3 feet to 5 feet. These new standards reinforce, add or revoke existing 1991 standards. If you are thinking of updating to these new standards, you may not have to. There is a short window for businesses to comply to the 1991 standards before the 2010 take effect. Where the 2010 standards revoke the 1991 standards we can point those out to save you the time and effort of complying to standards which will no longer be necessary. We can help you navigate these and more.

If you have any questions, of course feel free to email us at help@ytaccess.com or call our toll free number at 866-982-3212×2.

Share/Bookmark

Accessibility Tips 2 of 10: Parking Details

| Monday, July 12th, 2010 | No Comments »

This is the second video in a series of videos which give access tips. In this video we speak of more specific parking details. It builds on the last video which is about how to decide where to place accessible parking in the first place. Don’t let your business get caught with these liability issues. Access helps everyone!

Stay tuned for more!

For those of you who can’t see embedded videos, here is a short link: Parking Video #2

Share/Bookmark

Access Video 1: Parking Location

| Tuesday, May 25th, 2010 | No Comments »

This is the first video in a series of videos which give access tips. Stay tuned for more!

Share/Bookmark

ADA Compliance – Wearing Two Hats

| Thursday, May 6th, 2010 | No Comments »

By Phillip K. Cha, Esq.

While the ADA imposes legal obligations on a business regarding providing access to the disabled public (usually its customers or clients), it also creates obligations between a business and its disabled employees. While these obligations are addressed in separate sections of the ADA (Title I addresses private employers, whereas Title III addresses public accommodations) and involve different legal issues, there are some significant areas of overlap that should not be ignored. Importantly, the ADA may require that a business take additional steps above and beyond removing access barriers for the public to ensure that its employees also are provided equal access to facilities.

To illustrate, under Title I, an employer is required to provide “reasonable accommodations” to qualified individuals with a disability. The ADA regulations identify various types of reasonable accommodations, including retrofitting, to allow disabled employees to enjoy the same benefits and privileges as those enjoyed by non-disabled employees. Specific examples of reasonable accommodations, much like those that may be required under Title III, include installing wheelchair ramps and proper signage. This requirement applies to both work-related and non-work facilities provided or maintained by the employer for use by employees, including break rooms, restrooms, lunch rooms and training rooms, which might not otherwise be open to the general public.

In light of the interplay between Titles I and III, any ADA compliance plan should account for the company’s obligations as a provider of public accommodations, as well as an employer. Failure to wear both hats in going through this process may expose a business to substantial liability under the ADA and State law.

Phillip K. Cha is a labor and employment law attorney with Swerdlow Florence Sanchez Swerdlow & Wimmer in Beverly Hills, California. If you have any questions about the ADA as it applies to employers, feel free to give Phillip a call at (310) 288-3980 or e-mail him at pcha@swerdlowlaw.com.

Share/Bookmark

Is your Site Accessible?

| Monday, April 5th, 2010 | No Comments »

Below is a short quiz (geared for California Access Requirements) that you can take to assess your site’s general accessibility. Be aware that access is determined by far more complicated features.

 

Name:
Business:
Email:
Phone Number:

Informally Determine the level of Accessibility of your Site:

Do you have a parking space designated to be van accessible?
Yes
No
I do not offer parking.

Do you have a toilet seat with side and rear grab bars?
Yes
No
I do not offer restrooms.

What kind of hardware does your front door have?
It automatically opens and closes.
Lever.
Push-Pull.
Single Knob.
Push-Push.
Thumb-latch-D handle.
Turnstile

Do you have signage to designate the accessible features of your store (including doors, restrooms, counters)?
Yes
No

If you provide seating, are at least 5% of the seats designated for individuals with disabilities?
Yes
No
I do not provide seating to anyone.

Can you shuffle your feet across your main entrance without getting it caught on the threshold?
Yes
No

Does your main entrance door require more than 5 lbs to open?
Yes
No

Does the designated path from the public right of way or the parking at any time cross vehicular traffic to get to your main entrance?
Yes
No

Is there enough clear space throughout your store for a baby stroller to comfortably be pushed to all the locations of your goods/serivces?
Yes
No

Is at least one mirror above your sink low enough for individuals under four feet tall to be able to use them?
Yes
No
 

Share/Bookmark

Don’t Get Locked Out of Accessibility

| Tuesday, January 5th, 2010 | No Comments »

One of the most often-overlooked facets of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance is the door.  While parking, restrooms and signage are all notorious for their complexities, doors remain on top of the list for the California Building Code (CBC) of priorities for removing architectural barriers.  This is because while restrooms are often the site of accessibility lawsuits (for reasons we can get into in another article), and parking lots are highly visible, doors are the only architectural barrier which can single-handedly stop someone from entering a site. They can also be a direct source of injury if the door closes too quickly or is so heavy that it pushes one off-balance. Fortunately, it is relatively inexpensive to improve your door’s accessibility, especially considering the benefits that it confers to all of your customers, and even the psychological impression that an easy or difficult entrance to your business can impart.

In general, the path of travel requires what is called a pedestrian envelope.  This means that as a person travels through a site (with or without a mobility aid), there needs to be a hazard-free zone surrounding them.  Some of these requirements include edge protection, lack of protruding objects, lack of slopes and cross-slopes and clear vertical head-space.  What often gets missed is that such requirements also extend through the doorway.

Already the door has many requirements unique to itself as an architectural component.  Between the ADA and the CBC there are almost 60 unique facets of a doorway each. But between the two (one a set of civil rights laws with building code, the other a set of building codes), almost 30 (depending on interpretation) of the door requirements are shared.  While many of these don’t apply to every door, some common requirements that do apply are to further ensure that the pedestrian envelope continues uninterrupted through the door way.

These requirements don’t include some of the unstated requirements that are because of the pedestrian envelope.  Some of these include the door closer height:

 

Door Closer Above Doorway: Not a Hazard Door Closer Below Doorway: Possible Hazard

The door closer should always have its equipment above 80 inches.  Since commercial doors are often at 80 inches, to have the door closer arm extend under the doorway is a violation of the ADA.  While not all commercial doors are required to be accessible, as there can be multiple entrances to an area, or entrances to areas not serving the public within an employee area, doors that are accessible should be marked accessible when there are doors that are not accessible.  Thus door closers that go around the door-frame are preferred.  Door closers are a requirement for single user restrooms, so pay close attention to them.

Another common requirement for door closers is the closing time.  Doors that are self closing, such as those in restroom stalls, are required to take at least 3 seconds to close when held at a 70 degree position [diagram].  Door closers should also be adjusted so as to require less than 5 pounds of pressure.

Along with these height requirements there are also threshold requirements.  The ADA and CBC both allow for a maximum threshold height of ½ inches above the landing on either side if the threshold is beveled, ¼ inches if the threshold is not.  What is unstated in both and not allowed are horizontal gaps under the doorway of greater than ½ inches measured in the direction of travel.

While the pedestrian envelope constitutes one of the little understood applications of the code to doors, door usage goes beyond the code requirements.  Such knowledge requires a grasp of how the principles of the ADA apply to actual individuals using a given door.  Door hardware and door latch side clearances are two of such issues.

Door hardware constitutes one of the readily achievable facets of ADA compliance.  We are all familiar with the requirements of door usage — single knobs are no longer allowed.  What is often missed is the door latch (which in commercial doors can be at the bottom of the door) or the older style thumb-latch door handles.  Although not specifically mentioned, the use of a thumb with a pulling motion falls under the rubric of a complex twisting and grasping action which both the ADA and CBC outlaw.

Another set of requirements for the door which presents confusion involves the side clearances at doorways.  These clearances are essential to aid individuals using a mobility aid (such as a walker) in operating a door.  Wheelchair-using individuals and even parents with children inside strollers require level side clearances so they can get the leverage to pull open a door.  This space allows individuals to open the door without the added difficulty of moving backwards to make way for the door swing.  There are often a series of solutions that are co-present with solving latch side door clearances.  The most expensive but most encompassing is the installation of an automatic door opening device.  Alternative fixes would include reversing the door swing or moving it from one side to the other in order to comply with latch side clearances.  This of course, relies on knowledge about the local building code requirements on your building and about the different approach requirements to your door way.

Finally, the latch side clearances also constitute a usable space within a path of travel.  Often, fire extinguishers are placed there for convenience, blocking usage of that space.  Protruding object fire extinguishers can be made to no longer be protruding objects by having the lowest edge mounted below 27 inches, or by placing furniture or detectable warnings under them.  But these solutions to removing the hazard of a protruding object would only interfere with the clear floor space, making the door less usage or even unusable for individuals with mobility impairments.  Further investigation is required per site.

These are only some of the common considerations for doorway accessibility.  Doors are often taken for granted, as people think the width is the only requirement.  Doors constitute the single most important architectural barrier as an inaccessible main entrance means that any work done — whether it be with the restroom, the lobby, any common areas or even in the parking lot can become pointless if your customer cannot enter your business in the first place.

Improving the accessibility of your business may seem like an expensive endeavor, but with the right expertise, you can save both time and thousands of dollars from unnecessary construction. Make it easier, not harder, for your customers to come inside to your store. For any questions or assistance in improving your accessibility, call us today at 866-982-3212 or email us at help@ytaccess.com.

For a comprehensive list of applicable ADA/CBC codes,

Note: Many of these codes are subject to interpretation and may not reflect the latest versions applicable, especially in the case of official DSA Interpretations or Addendums. ICC/ANSI codes have been omitted. This list does not accurately reflect the full scope of methodology used by YTA and is published for informational purposes only.

CBC ADA
1133B.1.1.2 This nonaccessible exit does not have a directional sign.
4.1.2(7)(c) This entrance is not accessible.
1133B.2.6 The bottom 10 inches of the door creates a hazardous condition.
1133B.2.4.2 and Figure 11B-26A(a) There is not enough latchside clearance on the inside of the door.
1133B.2.5.1 The door closes too fast. 4.13.10 The door closes too fast.
1133B.2.5.1 The door does not close. 4.13.10 The door does not close.
1117B.5.2 The symbol on this door for the restroom is not of contrasting colors.
1115B.6 There is no symbol on this door for the restroom.
1133B.2.4.4 There is not enough room inside this vestibule for doors in series. 4.13.7 There is not enough room inside this vestibule for doors in series.
1008.1.2 and 1133B.2.5.2 The door hardware is not mounted at an accessible height. 4.13.9 The door hardware is not mounted at an accessible height.
1133B.2.5.2.c The vertical actuation bars outside the door are not at the required height.
1133B.2.5.2.c One or more controls operating this automatic door do not have a level clear floor space centering on the automated controls.
1117B.5.8.1, 1117B.5.5.3, 1133B.2.5.2.e, and 1133B.2.5.2.c One or more controls operating this automatic door are missing the full sized International Symbol of Accessibility.
1133B.2.5.c One or more controls operating this automatic door are not placed in a conspicuous location.
1133B.2.5.2.c The higher push plate inside this door is not the required height.
1133B.2.5.2.c The push plate operating the auto door outside this door does not open the door or there is only one push plate.
1133B.2.5.2 The door hardware is not accessible. 4.13.9 The door hardware is not accessible.
1133B.2.2 and 1133B.8.6.2 The door is too low. 4.4.2 The door is too low.
4.13.6 and Fig 25(b) and Fig 25(c) The Inside landing length is too shallow.
1133B.2.5.3 There is not enough latchside clearance on the inside of the door due to the alcove.
1133B.2.4.2 The inside landing slope is too great. 4.13.6 The inside landing slope is too great.
1133B.2.4.3, 1133B.2.4.5 and 1133B.2.5.3 The inside latch side clearance is too narrow.
1133B.2.4.2 The inside landing is too short. 4.13.6 and Fig 25(a) The Inside latch side clearance is too narrow.
1133B.2.4.2 and Figure 11B-26A(b) There is not enough width on the inside door landing.
1133B.2.4 There is no landing inside this door. 4.13.6 There is no landing inside this door.
1117B.5.2, 1117B.5.5, 1117B.5.5.4 and 1117B.5.8.1.3 The International Symbol of Accessibility on this entrance is not readily visible from the entrance to individuals with vision impairment. 4.1.2(7)(c) and 4.1and 4.30.5 The International Symbol of Accessibility on this entrance is not readily visible from the entrance to individuals with vision impairment.
1133B.2.5.2 The door latch is not accessible. 4.13.9 The door latch is not accessible.
1133B.2.5.3 There is not enough latchside clearance on the outside of the door due to the alcove.
1133B.2.4.2 and Figure 11B-26A(c) There is not enough latchside clearance on the inside of the door.
1133B.2.4.2 The outside landing slope is too great. 4.13.6 The outside landing slope is too great.
1133B.2.4.3, 1133B.2.4.5 and 1133B.2.5.3 The outside latch side clearance is too narrow.
1133B.2.4.2 The outside landing is too short.
1133B.2.4.2 and Figure 11B-26A(b) There is not enough width on the outside door landing.
1133B.2.4 There is no landing outside this door. 4.13.6 There is no landing outside this door.
1115B.3.2.7 and 1117B.6 The privacy latch is not accessible. 4.13.9 The privacy latch is not accessible.
1115B.3.2.7 and 1117B.6 The privacy latch is too high. 4.13.9 The door hardware is not mounted at an accessible height.
1115B.6.1 The sign on the door does not correctly identify the proper designation of this restroom.
1133B.2.5 The door pressure is too great. 4.13.11(2) The door pressure is too great.
1117B.5.7 There is no Braille on this sign. 4.30.4 There is no Braille on this sign.
1117B.5.7 The sign is too close to the door swing. 4.30.5 The sign is too close to the door swing.
1117B.5.7 The sign for this door is mounted too low. 4.30.6 The sign for this door is mounted too low.
1117B.5.5.4 The posted International Symbol of Accessibility on this entrance is too small. 4.30.4 The posted International Symbol of Accessibility on this entrance is too small.
1117B.5.8.1.2 There is no International Symbol of Accessibility on this entrance. 4.1.2(7)(c) and 4.1and 4.30.7 There is no International Symbol of Accessibility on this entrance.
1117B.5.5 The sign has no raised lettering. 4.30.4 The sign has no raised lettering.
1117B.5.2 and 1117B.5.7 The sign is not easily visible to individuals with vision impairment.
1117B.5.1 There is no sign on the latch side marking the usage of the permanent space behind this door. 4.30.1 and 4.1.3(7) There is no sign on the latch side marking the usage of the permanent space behind this door.
1133B.2.4.2 and Figure 11B-33 The sliding door is flush with the frame. 4.13.9 The sliding door is flush with the frame.
1133B.2.4.1 This threshold at the door is too high. 4.5.2 and 4.13.8 This threshold at the door is too high.
1124B.4 The gap in the path of travel is too great. 4.5.2 and 4.13.8 The gap in the path of travel is too great.
1133B.2.3.3 A revolving door is an entrance. 4.13.2 A revolving door is an entrance.
1133B.2.3.4 A turnstile, rail or another kind of pedestrian control is the only path of travel. A turnstile, rail or another kind of pedestrian control is the only path of travel.
1133B.2.2 The door is too narrow. 4.13.5 The door is too narrow.
4.13.6 and Fig 25(a) The inside latch side clearance is too narrow.
4.13.6 and Fig 25(b) The Inside landing width is too narrow.
4.13.6 and Fig 25(b) and Fig 25(c) The outside landing length is too shallow.
4.13.6 and Fig 25(a) The outside latch side clearance is too narrow.
4.13.6 and Fig 25(b) The outside landing width is too narrow.
4.13.2 A turnstile is an entrance.
4.13.7 The doors in this vestibule swing towards each other.
Overlapping 28
Unique CBC 21
Unique ADA 9
Total Unique 30
Total Combined 58

 

How liable does this make you?  Read our ADA FAQ for more information.  For information about assessing your site yourself or hiring an ADA expert, please look at our ADA Consultation page.

Questions? Call us at 866 982 3212 x2 or email us at help@ytaccess.com

Paths of Travel and how the ADA isn’t building code.

| Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009 | No Comments »

ADA is not Building Code
One of the most common misconceptions about accessibility is about how it should be applied. Many design professionals, building code officials and contractors treat accessibility only as building code. However, as accessibility became more complex, the concept of an accessible “path of travel” was fragmented and divided by specialty. For example, the asphalt contractor does the parking lot and the door installer does the doors. Unless the accessibility designer or the general contractor is able to get the specialists to follow his or her master design plan (instead of each doing their own thing), accessible features can end up apart from one another so that there isn’t a continuous path of travel. For example, consider the following image:

Pathing Path, no protection

Other than the slopes and cross slopes? What else is improper about where this parking is located?

Hint: A truly accessible parking lot isn’t just about striping blue paint according to the correct dimensions.

For accessible parking spaces, there needs to be a “bridge” to the accessible entrance and a protective “envelope” around the patron along this path. If you can imagine the asphalt as an ‘ocean’, one that is hazardous to someone in a wheelchair (who can be completely invisible to a driver backing out of a parking spot because of their low profile), you will realize the necessity of protecting the disabled patron with this path of travel.

Creating an accessible path can include various configurations of head aisles, cross walks, detectable warnings, edge protection and signage (not to mention addressing various hazards like grates or protruding objects). This becomes even more problematic when an owner or a designer does not understand the principle or reasoning behind the elements of an accessible path. This is because while the ADA guidelines specify only certain drawings as an example, there are invariably several possible solutions depending on the unique characteristics of each facility. The worst situations are where accessible parking is added where there is room for one feature (say an access aisle) but this is done without regard to where the main entrance is located, and a disabled patron must unnecessarily travel over twice or three times the distance that an able-bodied patron can travel to reach the entrance of a store.

This is where having the right consultant becomes so important. Knowing what your options are can save a ton of money and time while preventing confusing and even dangerous travel for a disabled individual.

Accessibility is more about fair access to goods and services than it is about construction. Elements along an accessible route need to comply with existing design standards, but as long as the good or service is made accessible with reasonable accommodation, construction might not be needed. The requirements of the ADA are many, but they are such that in the big picture, there are almost always alternate options available.

Furthermore, designers, contractors and inspectors don’t have control over how a building is used or what is offered within a building… that’s up to the occupant. If the occupant assumes that access is all about building code, as many often do, they may think they don’t have any responsibility when in fact their lack of awareness leaves them open to all kinds of liability.

A restaurant owner may think that an upstairs dining room is perfect for private parties or events. But what if a customer books a wedding at your location and it turns out that their grandma is in a wheelchair? Does this mean she can’t see her grandchildren during dinner? Providing equal (or equivalent) access is paramount, and where we choose to locate accommodations becomes a deciding factor in how an occupant configures a space. Unfortunately, there are few classes to teach business owners or commercial real estate agents the complex requirements for accessibility. So, YTA is here to help. If you have any questions of concerns about accessibility, feel free to give us a call at (866) 982-3212 or email us at help@ytaccess.com and we can consult with you to determine your full accessibility needs or even hold seminars for your organization or community.

 

How liable are you?  Read our ADA FAQ for more information.  For information about assessing your site yourself or hiring an ADA expert, please look at our ADA Consultation page.  Or call us at 866 982 3212 x2 or email us at help@ytaccess.com

 

Getting to Know Your Restroom Signs

| Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009 | 2 Comments »

Unisex Sign

Accessible signage can be extremely difficult to achieve if you don’t know what is required and what is not required. This is especially important if you are ordering custom signage that is both compliant with California Title 24 and looks good in your store!

The above unisex restroom sign is a great example of a sign that looks great, but actually has unnecessary elements. Consider the use of this sign: It is to be mounted on the restroom’s door, which is usually the only entrance and exit for the restroom.

Question: Why does this sign need Braille, “RESTROOM” in tactile (touchable) lettering and the ISA (International Symbol of Access, or the wheelchair symbol) on it?

Answer: It doesn’t need any of it. Putting Braille and tactile lettering on a door that constantly opens and closes without warning can be a safety risk for a visually-impaired person trying to read the sign. By law, you need all of this on a separate sign, mounted next to the door’s latch-side. By placing it there, someone can feel and read the Braille and raised, tactile lettering without having to worry about getting the door slammed on them. Also, the word “RESTROOM” and the ISA are not required on a door sign (though it can be helpful). The ISA can either be on the door or the latch sign.

There are a few other things to note about this sign. Notice that both the triangle (Men’s) and circle (Women’s) are blue. In dim lighting, the triangle may be impossible to see against the same-colored circle and does not provide sufficient contrast. Also, if the door itself is painted blue, it would be difficult to see the circle’s outline as well. Your restroom sign can actually be any color, not just blue. Just make sure it contrasts (light vs. dark, dark vs. light) with your door. A compliant restroom door sign (if it was blue) would probably look like this instead:

Unisex Sign CA T24

Strike-Side Sign

Now that we’ve covered the door sign, let’s take a look at the latch-side restroom sign. All of your accessible features should be featured on it, and also note the difference between latch-side and strike-side of a door: latch-side is where the door’s handle and closing latch are located, while the strike-side has the door’s hinges and the door will strike the wall when fully extended. There are specifications for the Braille and tactile lettering as well.The example on the right is generally what you’d be looking for in a latch-side restroom sign, but it is by no means the only style of sign you can install. One thing you must keep in mind, however, is that tactile text must be uppercase.

One of the best designers of accessible signs that we’ve ever seen is H. Toji & Company. Sharon Toji, a principal of the company, is one of the nation’s most qualified experts on accessible sign design and is a voting delegate to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) that writes accessiblity standards used by the International Building Code and are the basis for the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). She is also a member of the Access Advisory Committee to the California State Building Standards Commission, among others.

H. Toji & Company offers customizable signs with a wide selection of fonts, decorations and shapes, and have incorporated numerous features such as inlaid lettering and beveled edges that increase the sign’s durability, longevity and readability. If you are in need of accessible signage for your business, you cannot go wrong with signs from this company.

 

Read our ADA FAQ for more information on general liability.  For information about assessing your site yourself or hiring an ADA expert, please look at our ADA Consultation page.

Or, give us a call at (866) 982-3212 or email us at help@ytaccess.com and we can consult with you to determine your full accessibility needs, and refer you to Sharon Toji for any custom sign design specifications that you need.

ADA Damages Suits Don’t Require Intent, Calif. Supreme Court Rules

| Monday, June 22nd, 2009 | No Comments »

“Businesses that violate the Americans with Disabilities Act, even if unintentionally, can be sued for damages, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Thursday.

“Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar concluded that was a reasonable interpretation of the state Legislature’s decision in 1992 to adopt Civil Code §51(f) to amend the state’s Unruh Civil Rights Act to include violations of the ADA. While the ADA provides only injunctive relief whether the harm was intentional or not, Section 52 of the Unruh Act provides for damages of at least $4,000 or as much as three times the actual harm.”

link: Law.com

Share/Bookmark